Monday, September 16, 2019

MathJax Example using Latex and Automatic Equation Numbering

The Harmonic Oscillator The Hamiltonian for the Harmonic Oscillator is (1)p22μ+k2x2 where p is the momentum operator and x is the postition operator. We know that the Schrödinger prescription is (2)pix while xx, as usual. This means, as we well know, that the commutator of x and p is non-zero. (Note that we've dropped the operator subscript.)

The commutator: [α,β]

[p,x]f=(pxxp)f=ixxfx(ixf) where f(x)f, which leads to [p,x]f=(pxxp)f=fixx+x(ix)fx(ixf) which means, of course, (3)[p,x]=pxxp=i

The Ladder Operators Construction

For the Harmonic Oscillator, we form the two operators (4)a+=p+iμωx and (5)a=piμωx which differ solely by that intervening sign (Remember that ω=kμ). The entire derivation now hinges on the properties of these two operators. We start with the elementary question, what is the commutator of a+ and a?
<html>
<head>
<title>The Harmonic Oscillator</title>
  <script src="https://polyfill.io/v3/polyfill.min.js?features=es6"></script>
  <script>
  MathJax = {
    tex: {
      tags: 'ams'  // should be 'ams', 'none', or 'all'
    }
  };
  </script>
  <script async="" id="MathJax-script" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax@3/es5/tex-chtml.js"></script>
<script>
MathJax = {
  tex: {
    inlineMath: [['$', '$'], ['\\(', '\\)']],
tags:'ams'
  },
  svg: {
    fontCache: 'global'
  }
};
</script>




</head>

<body>
The Hamiltonian for the Harmonic Oscillator is
\begin{equation}\frac{p^2}{2\mu} + \frac{k}{2} x^2
\end{equation}

where p is the momentum operator and x is the postition operator. We know that the Schrödinger prescription is
\begin{equation}p \rightarrow - \boldsymbol{i} \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}
\end{equation}

while $x \rightarrow x$, as usual. This means, as we well know, that the commutator of $x$ and $p$ is non-zero. 
(Note that we've dropped the operator subscript.)


<h2>
The commutator: $[\alpha,\beta]$</h2>
\begin{equation*}
[p,x]f =( px - xp)f = -\boldsymbol{i} \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}xf -
x(-\boldsymbol{i} \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}f)
\end{equation*}
where $f(x) \mapsto f$,
which leads to
\begin{equation*}
[p,x]f =( px - xp)f = -f\boldsymbol{i} \hbar \frac{\partial x}{\partial x} +
x \left (-\boldsymbol{i} \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right )f - 
x\left (-\boldsymbol{i} \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}f\right )
\end{equation*}
which means, of course,
\begin{equation}
[p,x] = px - xp = -\boldsymbol{i} \hbar
\end{equation}
<br />
<h2>
The Ladder Operators Construction</h2>
For the Harmonic Oscillator, we form the two operators
\begin{equation}
a^+ = p + \boldsymbol{i}  \mu\omega x
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
a^- = p - \boldsymbol{i}  \mu\omega x
\end{equation}
which differ solely by that intervening sign
(Remember that $\omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{\mu}}$).
The entire derivation now hinges on the properties of these two operators.
We start with the elementary question, what is the commutator of $a^+$ and
$a^-$?


</body>
</html>

No comments:

Post a Comment